Timothy Wong
Matthew Wood
April 3, 2015
On
the Inhumanity and Legality of Abortion
Abortion has been and is one of the most discussed, most
hotly debated, and most zealously defended topics in today’s society. Both
Pro-Life and Pro-Choice defendants have strong opinions and powerful evidences
for their sides, causing the debate to rage on. However, at this point in
American society, abortion is legal in most areas. Many support this decision,
advocating for such benefits as a woman’s freedom over her own body, or the
valuable research that can be gained from aborted fetuses. However, I believe
that abortion is wrong and inhumane, not only from a religious standpoint but
from a moral and ethical one.
The most common argument from Pro-Choice advocates is
that a mother has a right to life, and a right to choose what happens to the
life inside her. She has a right to her own body. And, in many cases, she has a
right to abortion especially if her own life is threatened by the fetus, “when
the fetus is seriously in danger to the life of the mother herself” (1). In
this case, it is a dilemma of whether the mother or the fetus has a greater
right to life. I would consider it an issue of the lesser of two evils.
Legally, however, the mother has the greater right to life. “The common law
rule is that a fetus is not considered a living human being until it has been
born alive” (2). However, I would argue that it is the right and responsibility
of the mother not only to protect her own life, but to protect the life of her
unborn child. The fetus has no will or ability to defend itself; should not its
mother then be concerned with its well-being and right to life?
This argument, I believe, is supported scientifically by
a study performed at Princeton University. “..scientifically there is
absolutely no question whatsoever that the immediate product of fertilization
is a newly existing human being. A human zygote is a human being. It is not a
‘potential’ or ‘possible’ human being. It’s an actual human being with the
potential to grow bigger and develop its capacities” (3). As a living human
being with the potential for life, I believe a mother ought to have the same
responsibility to this child as she would her born children, or any other
person. Furthermore, if a child is to be aborted because of a genetic
deficiency, this poses an even greater moral issue. If we choose to abort a
fetus because it is or would be mentally or physically disabled, what stops us
from doing the same to other adults or children who are disabled? “…it is [as]
morally wrong to kill [a] disabled fetus as it is to kill disabled adults; thus
shows no more respect or hostility to disabled people and gradually
discriminate against them” (1).
From a scientific standpoint, unborn children, even at
the earliest stages, have unique genetic material and are considered human
beings. From a legal standpoint, while many still uphold the “born-again” rule
in regards to fetal homicide that is quickly changing. The Duke Law Journal
states, “Moreover, the born-alive rule serves no purpose in the modern law
other than to blindly imitate the past. The rule has simply outlived both its
necessity and utility, and states should accordingly abandon it” (4). Finally,
from a moral standpoint I suggest that abortion, even in protection of a mother’s
life, and especially when an issue of convenience or disability, is inhumane,
immoral, and wrong. At the very least, even if a mother is become pregnant as a
result of rape or incest, the child ought to be considered a human being, and a
vulnerable one at that, one without rights or any way to defend themselves.
There are many critical factors to consider before deciding that abortion is
the right option, and I do believe it is wrong in all circumstances.
(1)
Pich, C. (2012, November 2). Should
Abortion be legalized? Retrieved April 3, 2015, from https://www.academia.edu/8354859/Should_Abortion_be_legalized
(2)
Definitions of Life and Death. (n.d.).
Retrieved April 3, 2015, from
http://nationalparalegal.edu/public_documents/courseware_asp_files/criminalLaw/homicide/DefinitionsofLifeandDeath.asp
(3)
Irving, D. (1999, February 1). When Do
Human Beings Begin? Retrieved April 3, 2015, from
http://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html
(4)
Curran, D. (n.d.). ABANDONMENT AND
RECONCILIATION: ADDRESSING POLITICAL AND COMMON LAW OBJECTIONS TO FETAL
HOMICIDE LAWS. Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1397&context=dlj
No comments:
Post a Comment