Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Paper: The Curse of Conflict

I just finished my English II final this morning and received the score for my last paper in the class as well. I got a 95, which is fantastic, and I thought I'd share the paper here. It's an analysis of a poem called "Song of the Powers" by David Mason, which I will post below. I'm very happy with the paper, since I got to talk about war and stuff.

Song of the Powers

By David Mason
Mine, said the stone,
mine is the hour.
I crush the scissors,
such is my power.
Stronger than wishes,
my power, alone.

Mine, said the paper,
mine are the words
that smother the stone
with imagined birds,
reams of them, flown
from the mind of the shaper.

Mine, said the scissors,
mine all the knives
gashing through paper’s
ethereal lives;
nothing’s so proper
as tattering wishes.

As stone crushes scissors,
as paper snuffs stone
and scissors cut paper,
all end alone.
So heap up your paper
and scissor your wishes
and uproot the stone
from the top of the hill.
They all end alone
as you will, you will.
 
 
And here is the paper.
 
 
Tim Wong
Russell MW 8
4/28/14
The Curse of Conflict
            Humans are fickle creatures; they are corrupt, tainted, and bitter. Conflict and war, while occasionally fading into the background, will always surge forth again. The nature of war is summed up subtly yet simply in the game “Rock, Paper, Scissors.” A deeper look into the game is given in David Mason’s poem “Song of the Powers,” a relatively short piece that examines the mind of each object and how it relates to the other two. However, there appears to be an even deeper meaning to the game that not even Mason fully realized: the game “Rock, Paper, Scissor” is a reflection of the nature of human conflict and war as shown in both the words of David Mason as well as the ideas and implications one can draw from the poem. The isolating nature of power, the hidden attributes of each object in the game, and the never-ending cycle of war are all themes in the poem that require careful examination in order to fully understand.
            The primary idea that Mason presents in his poem is that power isolates. Each object has its own unique strength and, subsequently, its own weakness. In the game the stone is greater than scissors, which is greater than paper, which is then greater than the stone. In the first stanza of “Song of the Powers,” the stone says that it is “Stronger than wishes / my power, alone” (5-6). The first of the lines shows that the stone, through brute force as suggested when it says that “I crush the scissors,” is stronger than wishes and plans (3). The second line hints at Mason’s theme of isolation. The paper smothers the stone “with imagined birds, / reams of them, flown / from the mind of the shaper” (10-12). Finally, there are the scissors, which are constantly “gashing through paper’s / ethereal lives” and shredding its wishes to shreds (15-16).
            When one examines the poem’s individual elements, it is much easier to see its message as a whole. At the end of his poem, Mason says that the stone, paper, and scissors “all end alone.” This would indicate that each individual object, through the defeat of its opponent, stands by itself at the end of the day. This isolation is the goal of the game itself; the player with the mightier object wins but wins only to stand alone. However, there is a deeper meaning that can be taken from the poem. Each object represents a particular strength that is linked to conflict and battle. The stone represents brute force, the paper represents the strength of the mind, and the scissors represent reality. The stone, through pure strength, can overcome the logic and probabilities that the scissors present. In much the same way, a commander with enough willpower and determination can emerge victorious from a situation that would have appeared one sided beforehand. An example of this would be the battle of Red Cliff, also known as the battle of Chi Bi. In the battle, which took place towards the end of the Chinese Han Dynasty, the combined forces of Liu Bei and Sun Quan battled the armies of Cao Cao, which were more than twice as large as their own. However, through will, courage, and a dash of advantageous weather, the two leaders managed to defeat Cao Cao and forced him to retreat. However, the stone’s weakness is that it can be either dissuaded or smothered by paper’s words and wit. On more than one occasion, potentially devastating battles have evaporated because of one persuasive speaker. Other times, brute force and will were defeated through tactics and strategy. However, these are things of the mind, and the harsh reality that is represented by scissors too often rips them to shreds. The scissors are things of logic and probability; they are plans, numbers, and truths. But once again, these things are often conquered by the will, strength, and determination of the stone.
            This leads back to the idea that those who wield power, whether it is born out of strength, intelligence, or logic, will eventually stand alone. This idea is the binding element in Mason’s poem. He states that “They all end alone / as you will,” indicating that just as the stone, paper, and scissors find themselves isolated at the end of the day, so will we (27-28). This isolation is also a result of the simple yet vicious cycle of war. After the battle of Red Cliff, despite the victory won by the joint forces of Liu Bei and Sun Quan, the two leaders eventually parted ways when Zhou You, one of Sun Quan’s greatest commanders, died. This left Sun Quan greatly weakened and of no more aid to Liu Bei. Even if the paper smothers the stone, it will eventually be scattered to the wind by the harsh reality of the scissors. It is a never-ending cycle; war will exist for as long as man is on this earth.
And so, we can see that “Song of the Powers” is not only a story about how power isolates, but a symbol of the vicious cycle of war. While Mason may not have originally intended for his poem to represent this constant struggle his words certainly give that implication. What at first was a simple children’s game was personified through the words of David Mason. What at first was a simple personification of a children’s game is now shown to be a critique, whether intentional or not, of the eternal cycle of war and the curse of conflict.
           


No comments:

Post a Comment